Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beachwood 5 (5 / 1) - Independence-Independence 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 O.o.F.: 4-2-5-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Independence-Independence | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (4 / 1) - Holy Name 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Holy Name | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 3 (3 / 4) - Reynoldsburg 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 50 - 31 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| DeSales 4 (2 / 1) - Canal Winchester 1 (3 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 54 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 4 (2 / 2) - Pickerington Central 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 55 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 5 (1 / 1) - Franklin Heights 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 62 - 21 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Grandview 5 (3 / 0) - Ready 0 (3 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ready | |||||
| Magnificat 5 (3 / 1) - Westlake 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Magnificat | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westlake | |||||
| Mason 5 (4 / 0) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 5 (5 / 0) - Glenoak 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Glenoak | |||||
| Newark 5 (5 / 0) - Madison Christian 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 O.o.F.: 3-2-4-1-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Madison Christian | |||||
| North Canton Hoover 5 (6 / 2) - Lake-Uniontown 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lake-Uniontown | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 4 (3 / 1) - Olentangy Orange 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 57% # Games: 58 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Orange | |||||
| Strongsville 3 (3 / 0) - St. Joseph Academy 2 (3 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 64% # Games: 56 - 31 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Strongsville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Watterson 5 (3 / 0) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watterson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Western Reserve Academy 5 (1 / 0) - Archbishop Hoban 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 61 - 17 O.o.F.: 3-2-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Archbishop Hoban | |||||
| Westerville Central 4 (4 / 0) - Westerville North 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 54 - 27 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Whetstone 5 (2 / 0) - Columbus North International 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Whetstone | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus North International | |||||
| Worthington Christian 3 (3 / 2) - Wellington 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 61 - 44 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wellington | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:









































